Adam Lind has found himself in hot water with his baby mama...again! According to court documents obtained by RadarOnline.com, Adam's second baby mama, Taylor Halbur, accused him of neglecting their 3-year-old daughter, Paislee.
In court papers, Taylor claims she found their 3-year-old unattended at Adam's home. “I approached the house and began knocking on the garage,” Taylor wrote in the January 19, 2017 filing. “There was no response, so I proceeded to the front door of the home. I did not get a response from the door either. Ultimately, I just opened the door and went in.” She claims that she found Paislee sitting alone on the couch.
The papers read, “I finally saw Adam and he advised me he had just woken up from a nap. I understand he was sleeping in his bedroom away from Paislee. I did not see any other adult around at the time.”
According to Taylor, Adam's home is “not conducive to a child.” She wrote, “Plaintiff is unable to be a responsible adult and rise to a parent that can put Paislee’s interest first."
And after Paislee spends time with her father, Taylor claims to notice a difference. “When I get Paislee after she has been with Adam she is exhausted,” she claimed. “Generally she wakes up at 6:30a.m. when she is with us. On Monday morning, she did not wake up until 8:30a.m. and by 5:45p.m. was ready to go back to sleep. This is common after a weekend with Adam.”
Taylor asked the court to change his custody of Paislee to supervised visitation.
In Adam’s response to her claims, he accuses her of entering his residence without invitation, which is a violation of the South Dakota Parenting Guidelines. “I did take a nap that day and Paislee took a nap with me and fell asleep on my chest,” he wrote in his March 2, 2017 response. “Taylor is not being truthful in her affidavit.” He also disagreed that the environment he provides is not conducive to caring for a child.
As for her behavior in daycare, he claims she “could be acting out because she misses [Lind] and is not happy that she cannot be around [him] more.” Adding, “She is not exposed to violence when she is with me." And Adam continued, “She could be seeking attention that she does not get when she is with others after she has been with me.”
What do you think of the claims against Adam? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section!