'Skins' Creator Finally Speaks Out Against Critics
Jan. 25 2011, Published 8:38 a.m. ET
Skins was created in 2007 by Bryan Elsley and became a big success on British television. Now, the show has made its way onto MTV, but hasn't been very well-received. Elsley has now issued a statement responding to the criticism the show is currently facing.
OK! NEWS: SKINS LOSES A FIFTH BIG SPONSOR — SUBWAY
Since the show premiered on Jan. 17, critics have been very vocal, but the show's creator has remained silent. Now, Elsley has decided to issue a statement to MTV News on Monday and it's a very lengthy one!
"Skins is a very simple and in fact rather old fashioned television series. It's about the lives and loves of teenagers, how they get through high school, how they deal with their friends, and also how they circumnavigate some of the complications of sex, relationships, educations, parents, drugs and alcohol," he explained. "The show is written from the perspective of teenagers, reflects their world view, and this has caused a degree of controversy both in the UK and the USA.
"In the UK, viewers and commentators very quickly realized that although there are some sensational aspects to the show, Skins is actually a very serious attempt to get to the roots of young people's lives. It deals with relationships, parents, death, illness, mental health issues, the consequences of drug use and sexual activity. It is just that these are characterized from the point of view of the many young people who write the show and has a very straightforward approach to their experiences; it tries to tell the truth," Elsley said. "Sometimes that truth can be a little painful to adults and parents.
"Consequences do flow from incorrect or selfish behavior but in the show, these are shown to be unexpected, hard to predict, and more to do with the loss of friendship than anything else, which in any context, is a disastrous outcome.
"We proceed from the idea, not that teenagers are inherently likely to misbehave, but rather that they are intensely moral and disposed to make judgments on their own and others' behaviour," he added. "Sometimes, but not always, they get things wrong. In this teenagers are remarkably similar to adults. Their morals may not be the same as those of their parents and teachers, but they are nevertheless, highly developed and active in their world."
Want OK! each day? Sign up here!
OK! NEWS: MTV SKINS — SENSATIONAL OR REALISTIC?
Instead, it sounds like Elsley is encouraging critics to take a closer look.
"When viewers have taken the time to watch the show in a little more depth, they are less concerned about the behavior of the characters. Teenagers can be loyal, supportive, dedicated, focused, and capable of making informed value judgments about their lives," Elsley explained. "In the pilot episode of Skins, it's possibly easy to overlook the story wherein a young boy sets off to a party to sell drugs and have sex, but in fact, does neither of these things, because, he senses that he has been manipulated by friends and does not feel ready to have sex with someone he does not know properly.
"Skins is a traditionally made television series which has won countless international awards and gained a worldwide audience for stories about the joy, misery and challenges of being a teenager. The show has been used in anti-drug campaigns, has drawn praise for its portrayal of mental health issues and explorations of bereavement, sexuality, bullying and gender stereotyping."
"I have lost count of the letters we have been sent by viewers who tell us that they have been able to approach their parents or teachers with their difficulties after watching the show," Elsley added. "It is something that we take a great deal of pride in and which can unfortunately be eclipsed by some of the negative attention."
And in the end, it sounds like the goal of Skins as a show is not to break any laws.
"Our approach is not careless," he stated. "We've created a supportive and protective environment for everyone working on the show. And of course abide by the law, and give respect to our work colleagues who in this case, are young energetic and exciting people with so much to offer to an imperfect world."
What do you think of the statement? Do you agree or disagree?