Nick Cannon Insists He Will Keep Having Children 'If It's God's Will' After Having Baby Number 7 This Year
Nick Cannon's baby train is not slowing down any time soon.
TMZ spotted the Wild 'N Out host strolling around Harlem on Tuesday, September 7, along with friend Jim Jones, and asked the father-of-7 directly if he is opposed to having any more kids in the future.
The 40-year-old explained that, he will definitely continue to expand his brood just as long as it is where God leads him. "If God sees it that way, then that's what I'll keep doing," Cannon said. When asked how he can have so many children, the comedian exclaimed, "It's the aura, it's the essence!"
The fatherhood loving actor continued to joke that his swimmers are so efficient that he is going to open a "Cannon Sperm Bank."
Cannon shares twins Monroe and Moroccan with superstar Mariah Carey, along with other children Powerful Queen and Golden from his relationship with Brittany Bell.
- Dad-Of-Seven Nick Cannon Says He Wants '10 To 12' Kids, Says He Doesn’t 'Subscribe' To The Idea Of Creating A Family With Just One Woman
- 7 Kids & Counting: Everything Nick Cannon Has Said About His Unconventional Family Life
- Nick Cannon Declares Monogamy Is Unhealthy, Feels It Creates A 'Space Of Selfishness And Ownership'
The television personality is also a father to another set of twins Zion and Zillion with Abby De La Rosa, and a son named Zen that he welcomed this year with Alyssa Scott.
As OK! previously reported, Cannon stated earlier this summer that he would even want to have "10 to 12" children and that he does not "subscribe" to the traditional family style.
While appearing on The Breakfast Club, the funny man said, “That’s a Eurocentric concept when you think about the ideas that you’re supposed to have this one person for the rest of your life and really, that’s just to classify property when you think about it. When you go into that mindset, if we’re really talking that talk, like just the idea that a man should have one woman — we shouldn’t have anything, I have no ownership over this person.”
"If we’re really talking about how we coexist, and how we populate, it’s about what exchange can we create together? So I’ve never really subscribed to that mentality. I understand the institution of marriage and stuff, but if we go back to what that was about, that was to classify property," he continued.
