PoliticsDonald Trump Drops Part of $10 Billion BBC Lawsuit

Donald Trump narrowed his $10 billion legal battle with the BBC after dismissing claims against two company divisions.
July 17 2026, Updated 12:51 p.m. ET
Donald Trump has narrowed part of his $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC while continuing his legal fight against the broadcaster.
"All claims in this action asserted against the Studios Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees," according to court documents obtained by The Telegraph on Thursday, July 16.
It further added, "President Trump shall continue prosecuting his causes of action against defendant British Broadcasting Corporation."
Per The Telegraph, Trump agreed to dismiss his claims against BBC Studios Distribution and BBC Studios Production, the broadcaster's commercial and production divisions.
However, his lawsuit against the British Broadcasting Corporation remains active.
Donald Trump Continues Case Against BBC

Donald Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC centers on claims that an edited broadcast misrepresented his January 6 speech.
Trump originally filed the lawsuit in a Florida court in December 2025. He accused the BBC of defamation and violating trade practices laws over an edited segment from their Panorama program.
The complaint alleges the broadcaster condensed Trump's January 6, 2021, speech in a way that made it appear he said: "We're going to walk down to the Capitol… and I'll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like h-ll."
According to Trump's lawsuit, he said he urged his supporters to demonstrate peacefully.
Trump alleged the edit changed the meaning of his remarks and is seeking $10 billion in damages.
Although the claims against the BBC's studio divisions have now been dismissed with prejudice, meaning they cannot be filed again, the central lawsuit against the BBC continues to move forward.
BBC Stands by Its Legal Defense

Trump's lawsuit stemmed from a BBC 'Panorama' documentary edit of his January 6, 2021 speech that he said was defamatory.
The edited segment prompted internal controversy at the broadcaster.
BBC Director-General Tim Davies and Head of News Deborah Turness both resigned following the controversy.
The BBC later apologized for the edit, acknowledging that it created "the mistaken impression" that Trump had "made a direct call for violent action."
Despite that admission, the broadcaster rejected Trump's demand for compensation. The BBC has continued to argue that there is no legal basis for a defamation claim and is defending itself against the lawsuit.
- Revealed: The Huge Error Donald Trump Could Be Making by Launching New $10 Billion Lawsuit Against BBC
- Donald Trump Declares He Has an 'Obligation' to Sue the BBC for $1 Billion: They 'Defrauded the Public'
- Donald Trump Brings Ghislaine Maxwell Into Revived $10 Billion 'Wall Street Journal' Lawsuit Over Epstein Letter Story
Want OK! each day? Sign up here!
U.S. Government May Join the Litigation

Donald Trump’s legal battle with the BBC escalated after the U.S. government signaled it may get involved.
The legal battle could become even more significant after a new development involving the U.S. government.
On Thursday, July 16, the Financial Times reported that court filings show the government is weighing whether to become involved in the case.
According to the filings, the government told the Florida court, "it is considering participating in this litigation."

Donald Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC took another turn after the broadcaster raised conflict-of-interest concerns.
In its own filing, the broadcaster argued that "conflict of interest is clear and stark" if the U.S. government were to join the lawsuit while Trump remains president.
BBC lawyers also argued that "although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president," while the U.S. agencies considering involvement "are subject to his direction."
The lawsuit remains one of Trump's highest-profile legal actions against a media organization. The matter is set to go to trial in February 2027.

