TRUE CRIME NEWSLindsay Clancy Juror Initially Believed She Was Guilty But Switched Her Vote Since There Was 'So Much Doubt'

Sept. 10 2026, Published 5:39 p.m. ET
A fourth juror from the Lindsay Clancy triple-murder trial has broken her silence, admitting she initially believed Clancy was guilty and should be held criminally responsible before ultimately changing her vote to not guilty.
The anonymous juror spoke out following the September 4 mistrial declaration in Massachusetts.
Her comments came shortly after three other female jurors, including the foreperson, publicly criticized a lone male holdout for blocking an acquittal based on an insanity defense.

The juror said she initially believed Lindsay Clancy should be held criminally responsible for murdering her three kids.
The trial centered on the January 2023 strangulation deaths of Clancy's three young children. While the defense argued she suffered from postpartum psychosis and lacked criminal responsibility, prosecutors maintained her actions were a calculated, intentional decision.
The jury deadlocked 11-1 after roughly 38 hours of tense deliberations.
The fourth juror admitted that she entered deliberations believing Clancy was criminally responsible.

The juror changed her mind due to the prosecution not having a 'a figurative smoking gun.'
However, she shifted her vote to not guilty because prosecutors failed to eliminate the "gray area" regarding Clancy's mental state.
The female juror who spoke with CBS affiliate WBZ-TV under the condition of anonymity said: “At the end of the day, there was so much doubt.”
“There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say ‘Yup, 100 percent I’m certain she did it’ or that she didn’t do it. There was too much gray area,” she said.
- Lindsay Clancy's Attorney Reveals Why He Was So 'Upset' at Lone Juror Who Had 'Doubts' About Trial Verdict: 'That’s Not Right'
- Lindsay Clancy Murder Case Officially Declared a Mistrial After Emergency Bid Is Denied
- 'He Was Very Arrogant,' Jurors Say of Lone Holdout in Lindsay Clancy Mistrial Who Blocked Verdict
Want OK! each day? Sign up here!

Patrick Clancy has remarried since divorcing Lindsay Clancy.
While the first three jurors accused the lone male holdout of refusing to acquit despite admitting he had "reasonable doubt," the fourth juror defended him.
She stated that there were "big personalities" in the room and noted that the holdout was "not the only one that was unwilling to see things from the other side.”
The fourth juror stated she will never forget hearing the 911 call made by Patrick Clancy, the children's father, upon discovering the scene and believes Lindsay was guilty in a way, but the jury’s hands were tied.
“And maybe I still believe that in a certain way,” she said. “The prosecution didn’t have a figurative smoking gun."

The juror said Lindsay Clancy will not get the help she needs if she goes to prison.
With the jury hopelessly deadlocked, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial.
Lindsay is currently being held at a psychiatric facility, and a status hearing is scheduled for September 29.
The Plymouth County District Attorney's office said it will announce shortly whether it intends to retry the case. Meanwhile, Lindsay's defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, has publicly called on President Donald Trump to issue a state-level pardon.
The anonymous fourth juror said the only way for Patrick and the deceased children to receive the justice they deserve is for Lindsay to get “the help that she desperately needed. And there’s no way she’s getting that help in prison.”
"While the Lindsay Clancy case is an extreme and incredibly complex tragedy, my hope is that it starts a much bigger conversation about how we restructure our culture to better support mothers and make it truly safe for women to speak up when they are struggling," said Camila Greenberg, Sovereignty Coach and founder of SOULSPACE, which specializes in spirituality, identity shifts and nervous-system regulation.

