Two covers have been released with the interview, one for the print issue and another as a special digital cover.
One depicts the 56-year-old politician wearing a powder-blue Michael Kors suit, her arms crossed, with an American flag on her lapel. The second image, which sparked outrage shows Harris dressed more casually, sporting black Converse, pearls around her neck and standing in front of a pink and green backdrop — which the magazine described as a nod to her Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority.
Users on social media were quick to slam the image, “Kamala Harris is about as light skinned as women of color come and Vogue still f**ked up her lighting,” one user wrote. “WTF is this washed out mess of a cover?” While another called it “a mess up” and stated that “Anna Wintour must really not have Black friends and colleagues.”
A third wrote: “here’s 4 images of Kamala Harris that I had *saved in my phone* that are better than that Vogue cover,” alongside pics of the future VP, and a fourth asked, “have you ever seen a white female's cover look this cheesy? That's the mf big deal. They airbrush the f**k out of those covers and considering who she is, she deserves much better!”
Controversy accompanied the cover shoot since the moment the photos were leaked online — with Harris’ team telling the Associated Press that the print cover shot of the soon-to-be VP isn’t what both sides had agreed on, and that she was blindsided by the last-minute switch up by the magazine.
Vogue’s parent company Condé Nast is no stranger to debate over their covers, most shot by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz. The global media company has been accused of improperly lighting Black women, most notoriously the recent Vogue cover shoot of Olympic gymnast Simone Biles and Vanity Fair’s cover with A-list actress Viola Davis.
Vanity Fair’s July/August 2020 issue featured a striking portrait of the Oscar-winning actress. Wearing a midnight blue coat dress, Davis sits with her back — most of it exposed — to the camera as she looks to the left. It was reported that the photographer wanted to recreate the well-known image “The Scourged Back” — a harrowing 1863 photo that shows Gordon, a formerly enslaved man, sitting shirtless and slightly hunched over to display his back after he was brutally beaten.
“Be clear: I LOVE these pictures and I LOVE the hell out of Viola. But this photographer NEVER would have reimagined 'The Scourged Back' with Halle [Berry], Thandie [Newton] or Zendaya,” a user wrote on Twitter at the time. “This fascination Black men (straight and gay) have w/ linking darkskin women to slavery and trauma is jarring.”